Trump

Park Bench
15374

You know, I had to stop at the DEI topic. Till that I agree to the AI assessment.

I didn‘t read up what DEI contains in detail, so I can‘t say if I am pro or con to the whole of it. But I agree to the AI assessment that there will be inequalities if only a binary biological fact is applied and considered. That never was my intention. I just refuse to ignore scientific facts and construct a non-scientific theory for the purpose to abolish injustice in society. Science should stay science and not be mixed with morals and ideology, like mankind did so long and - to my surprise this still applies to most parts on this bloody earth - with laws based on religion. I am all for equality, but I don‘t see a single benefit why we must ignore basic science to achieve a just or at least more just and moral society.

1 Like
15375

i think you do… you choose to ignore “intersex”; our general term used for a variety of situations in which a person is born with reproductive or sexual anatomy that doesn’t fit the boxes of “female” or “male.”

biology and science has shown and proven to us there is more than binary sexes, i think its mainly religious and other ignorant people and their narrow minded ideology that wants to stick to 2 and stop researching… stopping research and finding new answers is anti-science and will always lead to a lesser moral and injust society

15376

No, intersex describes biological anomalies. But it‘s not a third sex. They still only have one or several X and/or Y chromosomes.

15377

thats what some say about females

15378

Yes, ancient Greeks, today religious nuts and misogynists.

15379

aye and yet they exist and continue to be born that way

15380

Yes, because there are two sexes, male and female.

15381

and those classified as intersex or as you call “them” “anomalies”

15382

some men only have xx chromosomes, so by that logic we should drop the male sex and just call everyone female and state there is only 1 sex…

15383

That‘s not what I wrote. How can you derive your logic from my post?

15384

naturally

interesting, some believe its just a matter of time and we will all be females:

15385

Mind to explain?

15386

i already did, i choose to interpret what i see in my own way

15387

Lol, it‘s ok, Nico. :laughing:

15388

lol yes it is

ok let me try a bit harder to explain my logic:

most women have xx chromosomes and most men have xy

while many variations like xxy, xyy, xxx, xxxy, xxyy etc etc exist
an yy doesnt, x is needed to survive

so then it would be more logical to state there is only 1 sex than 2

15389

Maybe you still didn’t try hard enough to sell your logic as mine. It has nothing to do with anything I wrote.

15390

lol that’s funny. He is making an excellent hypothetical point. Nice dodge lol.
If Trump gets his way, it won’t affect anyone grandfathered in already. It will force citizenship through legal means. Are you against that? In my opinion, it is the only way.

15391

He seems to want to take citizenship away from someone born here. That’s illegal.

There was no “dodge.”

15392

This shouldn’t really be an issue since their parents would be deported, they will take their USA citizen child with them as opposed to leaving the child on your doorstep. That hasn’t happened to me either.

15393

Why would he do that? The constitution is clear.