Who didn’t see that coming! He/she is a fool. It’s a wonder he didn’t break her jaw.
The fun part is they all knew it was going to happen so they banned video. You can’t find video of the massacre anywhere.
Oh, sure. The whole thing was a setup from the start so they can boast about their own greatness.
1 Like
Another women’s space is now violated.
you mean liberated 
i dont see how any sane person can disagree with that court ruling…
if you have a legal birth certificate stating you are a woman, then of course you have the same rights as any other woman
of course you can say that a person should not have been given that birth certificate but that is something you can take up with your government and try to change the laws on that…
That’s because you aren’t sane, Nico! 
That’s because you are stupid, Nico! Abraham Lincoln: If you call a tail a leg, how many legs does a dog have? Four. Just because you call a tail a leg doesn’t make it a leg.
That’s the first sensible thing you said. I can and do say that, true. I also do not choose to base my opinions on pieces of paper issued by governments. You recently agreed with me that borders are just imaginary creations of no natural meaning drawn by governments. So are birth certificates. If someone doesn’t have one (and billions don’t), were they not born?
interesting opinions, personally i wouldnt be surprised if in some language the word tail means leg or reg
excellent choice
guess the world should be very thankful that the majority decides what laws we have, that you are a coward and that you choose to follow those rules… otherwise you could make planet earth great again and become the mass murderer you always wanted to be eh? lmao
yes, although no i always agreed with that
no, those are actually physical documents which can be quite handy for legal reasons
yes, no, maybe? billions believe a son of a god was born and lived on this planet and that someone else had an immaculate conception… if they had a birth certificate that sure would have cleared up a lot of things!
i do not think its relevant to this issue; we can all believe what we want on every subject
the real question is who decides who is male or female or something else? we all can do that for ourselves but what gives them the appropriate rights?
the only answer in todays society is the laws of the government in the country you live in
It’s a good decision, but one not based on human rights. It was dismissed on a technicality.
BC Lions are a local Canadian football team. They are popular here.
From ChatGPT:
Gender Dysphoria
In the United States, Canada, and Europe, gender dysphoria affects an estimated 0.005% to 0.6% of the population, with increasing numbers seeking medical transition.Amputation
Globally, an estimated 0.1% to 1% of the population are amputees, with higher rates in conflict zones and regions with high rates of diabetes. In the United States, approximately 2 million people (~0.6% of the population) live with limb loss, with 185,000 new amputations occurring annually. In Canada, around 200,000 people (~0.5%) are amputees, while in Europe, prevalence is similar at 0.5% to 0.7%. Most amputations result from vascular diseases like diabetes, followed by trauma and congenital conditions.
So my question to you is simple, Nico. Should governments stop any references to humans having two arms and two legs, in order to accommodate the amputee community?
not sure i understand your question, goverrnments and people in general can and will refer to humans as they want
True, and governments often release information (airline passenger safety, CPR instructions, safe ways to stand on public transit) assuming you have two arms and two legs. Is this wrong? Should the airline safety demonstration say, “the face mask will drop in front of you if the plane depressurizes, hold it with one hand and use the other hand to secure the straps behind your head, unless you only have one hand in which case you should prepare to die, but at least you should feel good about being included in our demonstration”?
lol again not sure what you are after, as i said people will refer to others as they want
To be fair, to me those are two different things.
The question regarding transgender is, if it‘s really a own sex category or not. Sex is defined based on reproduction. And I haven‘t read anything yet which proves that there are more than two sexes. You still need two sexes, namely the female and the male one.
Now of course, if scientists want to redefine this actual definition for sex, for that also non-binary fit into it - or even the one who identify with both or rather as a duck - then there are worse things to worry about. But as long as the current definition is valid, I go with it.
we already established we do not need male and female for reproduction
Only your crazy mind did.
Great, then you shouldn’t have any problems with governments referring to people as male or female. Settled.