Yes. I’d agree with that. Bill was a bit of a humanitarian and civil rights activist. I don’t think Wilt cared about anybody else.
Bill won 11 championships and Wilt won 2. If the game was 1 on 1, Wilt was probably better. Before Jordan came around a lot of people thought Russell was the best player of all time. Those people are now old or dead. He’s not even top 10 now, which is fine but somehow Wilt has surpassed him.
I’m off today for the weekend. My sport includes bagging as many leaves before 4 pm when it gets dark. The town picks them up curbside this Saturday. I bet I’ll be better at this than Wilt Chamberlain would be. I have no woods, but do have trees.
The town drives by every house in the town to see if lawn bags are left out. They probably do this from 7 to 4. We have 24,000 people. I’m not sure how many houses. Maybe 5000. Probably not fun, but maybe it goee fast.
I think he would be more well liked if he didn’t beat Federer. If Federer was never around, he probably would be well liked. Although, he wouldn’t be as dominant as he is, without Federer and now he’s had no rival for 3 years.
I would have DQd him too. He was probably trying to open up his lungs, which is cheating and blowing secondhand in his competitors face is also cheating.
Not because I think it should even be illegal. Smoking is legal here. That is DQ worthy.