If the funds going to clean the water is not being used for that purpose, he should try to get rid of it. Do you object to that?
That certainly may be true but I seriously doubt it is. Apparently Winnipeg has poor air quality. Even Vancouver has poor air quality according to this quick Google. https://www.accuweather.com/en/ca/vancouver/v6c/air-quality-index/53286
So in fairness, Canadaās higher elevation does not protect them from poor air quality.
Iāve just been reflecting on our food quality as opposed to that of other countries and itās quite different. That led me to thinking about how we are poisoning the soil with the chemicals in our food, the way we dispose of chemical waste compared to other countries and of course that led to thoughts about air quality everywhere and just how good it really is, you know, if we are being honest about it.
I donāt think the act is costing money federally, other than the feds making sure municipalities are testing the water. Unless you want the entire US to look like Flint, Michigan, itās probably worth keeping. My guess is Trump does not drink water, so he might be interested in getting rid of it, which would help places that are cheap and donāt care about their people.
I have no idea what youāre on about, Michele, but itās nice youāre back here. I have travelled quite a bit and have never experienced air as good as Canadaās. Vancouverās is especially good, but all Canadian cities have extremely rigorous regulations about emitting poisons.
As of the latest available data, both Winnipeg and Vancouver are experiencing good air quality.
Winnipeg:
According to Environment Canadaās Air Quality Health Index (AQHI), Winnipegās current and forecasted AQHI values are 2, indicating a low health risk. This suggests that the air quality is ideal for outdoor activities.
The Air Quality Health Index for Vancouver also indicates a low health risk, with a current AQHI value of 2. This means that the air quality is ideal for outdoor activities.
This is good. Let the USA turn into a filthy shithole. Let the Democratic states realize that the MAGA morons are destroying everything they worked hard to build, and let them separate. Let the MAGA shithole states discover the hard way that theyāre all leeching from the Federal Government, not bleeding from it. And let the USA split into Cascadia and Inbredlandia. I would totally support Canada joining with Cascadia to form a new nation, but there is no way in hell I would accept that deal if the MAGA inbreds are part of it. Any state that didnāt vote Democrat by a margin of 10 points is out. And then (and only then), letās build a wall.
Youāre so smart. Thatās a great idea. Letās reflect for a moment. In Portland Oregon, Antifa has all but burned the city down. Which MAGA moron, in the Democrat controlled city, did that?
Oregon is a shithole and you are right. They do leech off the entirely too big American government.
That would be a pretty sweet deal for Canada, Reg. Prime ocean front real estate in America is not free but I wouldnāt mind trading the shithole property for everything east of BC.
You donāt want everything east of BC, Michele. Alberta and Saskatchewan are redneck provinces but by the time you hit Ontario (and all points east) you are back into intense Trump hatred. But Iād take your deal in principle. Inbredlandia can have Alberta and Saskatchewan in exchange for your Democratic states. The resulting nation formed of Democratic states and most of Canada (I like the name Cascadia but Iām open to ideas) would instantly be the best on Earth.
I can almost see your vision but adding more concrete to beach front property is not going to make it the best on earth. However, Trumps crackdown on crime may give the public more freedom to pursue their own interests without fear of attack, which may even ruin your vision for creating the best place on earth.