Do you think this guy knows what he’s talking about?
no!
Most definitely not.
No, he’s a moron, but I also tend to think of Trump as the Antichrist.
Then what does it mean?
It means some low-iq nut job in the US went on a Telegram rant and nobody cares.
That’s not what I asked.
You don’t have to care. As long as we are on the same page with regards to this prophecy because I don’t want you to be ignorant of the truth and you seem completely oblivious to it so if you agree the “covenant with many” prophecy has been fulfilled and there is no such thing as a 7 year tribulation, we are on the same page.
excellent clip
Then I saw when the Lamb opened one of the seven seals, and I heard one of the four living creatures say with a voice like thunder, “Come!” I looked, and behold, there was a white horse. The one riding on it had a bow, and a crown was given to him. He went out as a conqueror so he might conquer. - The Revelation 6:1-2 TLV
I’m not sure where I got the idea this scripture was an image of the Antichrist but the more I read it the more I believe I have been repeatedly lied to, to the point that I can’t discern the truth and maybe that was deliberate, I don’t know.
This morning I took a perhaps deeper dive into this Scripture. Zachariah 6 gives spiritual imagery to Rev. 6. with God sending chariots with white horses to the west, to conquer and be a conqueror.
Anything beyond this is speculation to me.
I’d like to know if you have always thought the antichrist is the rider on the white horse and what have you been taught that makes you think that?
 AgeofGrace:
 AgeofGrace:I’d like to know if you have always thought the antichrist is the rider on the white horse and what have you been taught that makes you think that?
i was taught to think for myself so i do not believe in imaginary (anti-) christs
anyone riding a horse is an animal abuser, though
 thinkingaboutit:
 thinkingaboutit:i was taught to think for myself
Had you thought about it, this is not the reply you would have given.
 AgeofGrace:
 AgeofGrace:Had you thought about it, this is not the reply you would have given.
i definitely would and will 
None of those things are “proofs”. They are circumstantial evidence. That said, I doubt that a man named Jesus of Nazareth ever walked on the planet Earth.
Fulfilled prophesy confirms His birth, death and Resurrection. Testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses is proof. Jewish historians have mentioned Him in their writings. Tacitus, in his writings about the Great Fire of Rome, stating Nero falsely accused and executed with the most exquisite punishments of those people called Christians, who were infamous for their abominations, by hanging them on crosses, setting them ablaze and using them for night lights in his garden.
Of course, this is not contemporaneous history so there is no real proof of His existence in those writings, but then, neither is there any proof of WWI. All history is apparently non-existent at this point.
 AgeofGrace:
 AgeofGrace:Fulfilled prophesy confirms His birth, death and Resurrection. Testimony of 2 or 3 witnesses is proof.
what fulfilled prophesy is that?
if only any of those witnesses wrote about it…
 AgeofGrace:
 AgeofGrace:there is no real proof of His existence in those writings, but then, neither is there any proof of WWI. All history is apparently non-existent at this point.
thats correct there is zero writings mentioning your jesus from the timeline your jesus supposedly existed… which most likely makes it fictional church propaganda
yet there are still some survivors from ww2 that are alive and many wrote about it during that timeline… which makes it history
(1 Corinthians 2:9)  But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.
(1 Corinthians 2:10)  But God hath revealed them unto us by his Spirit: for the Spirit searcheth all things, yea, the deep things of God.
(1 Corinthians 2:11)  For what man knoweth the things of a man, save the spirit of man which is in him? even so the things of God knoweth no man, but the Spirit of God.
(1 Corinthians 2:12)  Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God.
(1 Corinthians 2:13)  Which things also we speak, not in the words which man’s wisdom teacheth, but which the Holy Ghost teacheth; comparing spiritual things with spiritual.
(1 Corinthians 2:14)  But the natural man (Reg, thinkingaboutit, Gundi) receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
(1 Corinthians 2:15)  But he that is spiritual judgeth all things, yet he himself is judged of no man.
(1 Corinthians 2:16)  For who hath known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him? But we have the mind of Christ.
 
   
  