as i said maybe you should support the afd or have bought a tesla to support elon or bought some russian tank from putin… its basically the same thing
ps: erdogan, putin and trump support all those points as well
You need a man and a woman to produce a child. What’s wrong to view and foster this natural combination as the traditional family and set financial incentives to enable couples to have more children for that no mass immigration is needed?
by itself its great… when your purpose is to get rid of migrants, its inhumane
I’ve already told you that I don’t support the AfD and I told you why. (Link)
My question to you, Nico, is simple: what in that ChatGPT write-up do you disagree with?
Not to get rid of but not needing more migrants. Especially not in masses.
Gene pool here insufficient.
Euro Ice cream melting down again. Keeps looking cheaper and more like #2 every time. Microwave and freeze, microwave and freeze.
uhm no you didnt exactly say why
people wanting for themselves a “traditional” family or “traditional” gender roles is great, when they want to enforce that on everyone thats not so good…
pandora’s box was opened; there is no going back; a family is no longer just a man+woman+child+dog and genders are no longer only binary
Yes I did. Germany is facing a choice: accept change or wait to die. The AfD chooses to wait to die. I support accepting change and trying to make it positive. That is why I don’t support the AfD. We have a clear difference in vision.
All true, but I’m not convinced this is good. We are unhappier than ever.
ChatGPT:
Happiness levels in 1950 were generally higher than today in many Western countries. Surveys from that era suggest people reported greater life satisfaction, with strong social bonds, stable family structures, and a sense of optimism following World War II. Economic growth, job security, and community engagement contributed to this. However, life in 1950 also had challenges, including social inequalities, stricter societal norms, and limited personal freedoms for many groups. Compared to today, people may have felt more content with simpler lifestyles and clearer life paths, while modern society, despite greater personal freedom and technological advancements, experiences more anxiety, social isolation, and existential uncertainty.
Happiness is very relative and depends heavily on the differences within a society. I bet a country where most have less money than a country where the income difference is significantly big, scores better on the happy diagram.
ofcourse its good, progress just comes with a cost/responsibility; the more educated people are and the more luxury is available, the lazier and more selfish they can become and the more they demand… especially if they see or think others have it better or think they are to blame for them not getting what they want
Yes, life appears having been way more simple a few decades ago. And everything was slower. Now technic evolves so fast, you barely keep up if you aren’t a techi. A train and bus ticket was so easy to obtain before everything went online. Groceries too. Also, the more homogenious a society in every criteria is like income, status, cultural identity (incl. religion or the absent of it), the higher the happyness.
This is what misogyny is. Not some guy preferring traditional gender roles at home.
https://www.rt.com/news/617927-finland-misogynistic-school-attack/
1 Like
Looks about 140. Wouldn’t that be your hero against females shaming you about being secretly gay? Also a better more appreciated partner?
Why don’t you just replace that word misogyny with gay Reggie? Why introduce that cowardly violence.? You’re too easily emotionally shattered and fragile.
It’s obvious what you are trying to deny and protect.
Just sounds like you want a youth to groom. I don’t see how this is relevant to feminism in any way. You say misogyny. Would this be a protege or prodigy of a " vile dutch p_____t" that would bring you respect? The future of never having a relationship with a female does not seen to dissuade such action.
You are trying to flip the script on Nico now, when it’s your issue of sexual preference.
That news isn’t local to you
Reg, you have really tried to sabotage any possible female relationship i could have had.
You know what I remember about you when you first started warming up towards me? These comments you used to make about “pssst Mark, these guys shave their _____!”
You repeated that several times and I never figured out why. I never suspected you were testing the waters if another person was in homosexual lust as you were. When you didn’t get your response you started portraying my weight as undisciplined. You began trying to make me appear I had disgusting health and body conditions. You made it seem like I was should be undeserving of any type of intimacy or fulfillment because I had no regard for health or hygiene.
You kept labeling me insane.
You made some good arguments against feminism, but look how you erode masculinity.
Look at how unhealthy your body is. I don’t have those ulcers, leaky gut, super high diabetic levels and negative consequences.
You found a source of health and strength that made you feel weak and inferior.
You were impotent. You acted shamefully and disgracefully pretending you wer concerned about health and happiness.
Somebody should have told that to females before they committed to a relationship with you.
“I just think you would be happier if you were 140 pounds” you keep saying.
What’s a synonym for happiness? Gay. Whats 140 between us supposed to be? A shared twink?
You must be a real disappointment .
You’re sick Reg.
Why do you keep repeating Vile Dutch Pervert and then laughing “oh ok I admit,. I’m Dutch”
You want that title for yourself…But your body can’t handle sex.
You know why you meltdowns and everyone else here?
Because I’m too hard, too hot, too dense.