ah yes dune prophecy was pretty good! not much action but a slowpaced scifi drama mainly focussed on "the sisterhood’
that guy that is ragnar in that vikings series plays a very interesting character
a 2nd series has been confirmed
1 Like
This scene doesn‘t even belong to my favourite ones, probably because it’s neither funny nor sad and doesn‘t stir up emotions in me generally, but it‘s probably the most important one for Lucifer for so many reasons. His father finally acknowledges and apologizes to him for being a bad father. Luci is able to forgive him and that‘s what puts an end to his incredible rage against him as well as his self hatred. And he grew because his first thought was not about himself but his brother.
Ok, I got some feeling. Anger, lol. He nearly wouldn‘t have told Lucifer what he did, but managed to open up towards Amenadiel. Only because Luci made that step forward, he obviously fell inclined to do so as well. God, does God suck as a father, lol.
This scene I like because of the intensity in his speech. Poor Chloe. And it‘s one of the rare scenes also Chloe can get a bit loud and also emotional. He is wrong of course and despite I like Eve, she indeed is a bad influence on him. But in her core, she is a good person.
My favourite scene in that episode was, when Chloe comes late in the morning to LUX and both talk at the bar. He was wrong by what he said there too, but it was a beautifully intense speech by him. It made clear he didn‘t know yet what person he wants to become. He hurt Chloe immensely, but he corrected it later. And that’s all what counts at the end. Unfortunately I can‘t find it yet on the net.
All actors were great in Lucifer, while Rachael Harris as Dr. Martin easily can compete with Ellis, despite having not that many scenes to prove it. Well, this one here also mainly let‘s Ellis shine, but I am the last person who would complain about that, lol. Anyway, Harris is a gorgeous actress.
Awesome, intense emotions. From calm to anger to despair.
This is exactly why women do not rule over men.
But that’s a lie, too.
Yes, and when they grow up they question why an adult lied about that and then may question what else they’ve lied about.
Who lied and told you lies are harmless? Who lied and told you there was a such thing as white lies? Who invented the concept of a white lie and why are you giving glory to them with your declaration of harmlessness?
That same child might call you a liar, when in fact, you may have good intentions to share truth but how would a child know the difference if you confuse them with words from both sides of your mouth?
In conclusion, I deduce that you seem to feel that a lie is only harmful when you don’t use its full potential, such as when a such child asks for a truthful answer and you must sacrifice the belief you hold dear and sacred to your life in order to appease the child, regardless if that child grows up thinking that Heaven is real only to be crushed in learning by his/her college professor that you lied to them as a child.
That makes no sense.
It makes more sense than telling yourself it’s okay to lie to a child by telling them the truth.
no such thing, there are many truths 
No it doesn‘t, as there are also some male Atheists which would give the same answer to an especially deadly sick child. Therefore your „logic“ isn‘t logical.
If there is no such thing, how are there many truths?
Your argument is that it must be true because males say the same lol? If my logic is illogical to you it’s because I’m only parroting your bizarre claim. If you could justify the need to lie to yourself while telling others the truth, that would be incredibly helpful to understanding your logic.
No.
First, I think it‘s only decent behaviour and shows of empathy, if an adult (btw. regardless which religious belief or non-belief that person has), would not want to take the hope from a deadly sick child to come to a beautiful and happy place after it dies and where it also will meet it‘s parents eventually again.
Second, you obviously think this behaviour of mine, as a female Atheist lying about my belief regarding heaven to a deadly sick child, justifies why women should not rule over men (which btw. I neither claimed nor wanted, in fact I don‘t want any gender to rule over another one in a relationship). I simply stated that this „logic“ of yours fails, as there are also male Atheists who would act just like me in the very same situation.
But I assume, you are just once again mental and argue for the sake of arguing. Well, go on if you have to. 
there are many truths because there are many people with many views
I’ve decided to start from the bottom and work my way up on this post so I may quickly remind you that I haven’t argued the point, yet. I am still waiting to get a glimpse into your view.
Correct.
But we aren’t talking about relationships. We are talking about atheistic beliefs. Try to stay on topic, Sister.
What makes you certain they will meet their parents?
You sounds like 
probably because what i typed is pure logic and makes perfect sense
Or maybe you gave my reply to ai and that’s the answer you got?
lol iam not reg
edit: ok i was curious and asked chatgpt how there are many truths:
The idea that “there are many truths” comes from the recognition that truth can be subjective, contextual, or multi-faceted. Here are some ways in which multiple truths can coexist:
- Personal Truths: Each person has their own experiences, beliefs, and perceptions, which shape their understanding of the world. What may be true for one person in a particular situation might not hold for another. For instance, two people witnessing the same event may interpret it differently based on their personal backgrounds or emotions.
- Cultural Truths: Different cultures may have distinct values, customs, and practices that are seen as true or important within that specific culture. For example, ideas about morality, what constitutes good behavior, or spiritual beliefs can differ vastly across cultures, yet each can be considered “true” within its own cultural context.
- Relativism: In philosophical terms, relativism suggests that truth is not absolute but is relative to the individual or group. Ethical relativism, for example, claims that moral judgments are not universally true but are instead relative to the cultural or individual perspective.
- Contextual Truths: Some truths can depend on context. For instance, the statement “it’s cold outside” may be true in one geographic location at a certain time but false in another place or season. Thus, truths can change depending on the situation, environment, or even the scale at which something is considered.
- Scientific Truths: In science, “truths” are typically considered provisional. Scientific knowledge evolves as new discoveries are made, and what is true at one point in time may be revised or expanded upon. This fluidity in scientific understanding does not mean that there is no truth, but that the truth is understood in a dynamic, ever-improving way.
- Objective vs. Subjective Truths: There are also objective truths (things that are universally true, regardless of individual beliefs, such as “water boils at 100°C under normal atmospheric pressure”) and subjective truths (things that vary based on individual perspective, such as personal preferences or feelings).
In short, multiple truths can coexist because truth is often influenced by perception, context, culture, and experience. These diverse perspectives allow for a broader, more nuanced understanding of the world.
According to CoPilot (Microsoft’s AI), the Netherlands was 9th in 2019, 10th in 2020, 12th in 2021 but dropped off to 24th in 2024.
1 Like
ah nice… bastards!