Not true. You lie for entertainment.
What is your current lie about what he said about what to do when churches and parents weren’t feeding the children, Michele?
Nothing, Reg.
Exactly what I said he said. Nothing. He was a POS.
Exactly! He never said to do nothing. You’re a lying POS for lying.
Michele, you are unusually insane today. See my statement below.
You’re still a lying POS. He said to get a job, you lying POS.
He said the kids should get jobs? Michele, try to be sane. Charlie Kirk said parents and churches should feed children. The question is simple. What do we do when they don’t? Do we as a society let the children go hungry or not?
Quit dodging, quit spewing insane nonsense, and answer the question. Do we let the children go hungry or not? Yelling “get a job” to some drug addicted parent doesn’t help.
Charlie Kirk was against society feeding hungry children. He was a POS. And if you agree with society letting children go hungry, so are you.
That’s what the ding ding said, to which Charlie Kirk replied, “the parents”.
Quit dodging, quit spewing insane nonsense, and answer the question. Do we let the children go hungry or not? Yelling “get a job” to some drug addicted parent doesn’t help.
The Church will never turn anyone away.
I would only agree with society letting you go hungry. Now I’m a POS.
Again, dodging. If there is no church charity available, and the parents are not there, and a 10 year old kid doesn’t know to head to a church anyway, should society feed the kid? I say yes. If you say no, then yes, correct, you are a POS.
Well…I guess if you’re not going to leave me a free speech choice apart from consequences then yes.
Not going to leave you a choice? You have a clear choice. After all other options fail, where there are no churches and no parents present:
- Society feeds the kid.
- Society does not feed the kid.
Those are the choices. There are no other choices. Those who choose #2 are horrible people.
Can’t we just starve the little darlings until they reach a satisfactory weight according to horrible people’s standard?
obama is a real legend, i wonder what america would look like today if he or any other sane person was still president of your country…
3 Likes
The gun laws advocated by the Republicans and the late Charlie Kirk make using a military type weapon with a $2,000 scope to kill a man fairly easy.
Canada has better gun laws than America and people giving speeches don’t get shot dead. Nor do we have the mall and school shootings that America does.
This is exactly right. Charlie Kirk advocated for the policies that killed him, and stated clearly that he felt a certain amount of murder was an acceptable price to pay for the 2nd Amendment. Karma and Irony took care of the rest.
2 Likes