I suppose that’s possible. I’m not sure why it would be necessary since the entirely too serious episode is built around the punchline.
Yes, incredibly demanding that way.
That’s because there aren’t any, beyond Telegram.
Unbelievable clips. Stains on his pants are not believably. At best, you’re making the case that living in the same town makes Trump guilty by association, which only serves to discredit Trumps taste in good company. Unlike my factual statements with recently released evidence of a coup to undermine Trump’s presidency, you’re still speculating at this point.
you think this bald journalist/writer is lying about dozens of pics of naked girls sitting on trumps lap which he saw on multiple occasions?
no, just living in the same town or even being a neighbour doesnt make someone guilty by association, them being friends for over 15 years, having private parties with young girls together, epstein attending trumps wedding, going to the same parties, visiting eachothers houses and having that confirmed on several videos and by multiple witnesses does make trump guilty by association and most likely guilty to a lot more…
No, I think he’s lying about the extent of their relationship. He can paint it any way he wants. The facts don’t reflect the true nature of his relationship.
That only confirms they were in the same social circle. Once the complaint was lodged against Epstein for hitting on one of Trumps Mar-a-Lago members daughter and was banned, that relationship ended.
If you’re so willing to entertain the fact that they went to the same parties, where is your outrage at all the other perverted guests that attended those parties who would also be guilty by association, instead of trying to pin this whole thing on the one and only innocent man?
if he isnt lying then the pictures are true which makes the relationship between epstein and trump as close as it can get without actually fornicating eachother…
lets verify if that relationship really ended by releasing all the files!
just because other creeps attended the same pedo parties doesnt make trump innocent… again, lets release all the files and go after all the pedos !
1 Like
I don’t know why anyone would object to this. Clinton practiced spending restraint. The very source for his surplus.
stop the windmills before its too late! lmao
1 Like
I agree. They run on diesel which could be bad for the environment.
lol perhaps in america? but none here “run on diesel”
ok not even there according to my ai pal:
*** No, wind turbines do not run on diesel. They generate electricity by harnessing the kinetic energy of the wind to turn blades, which then rotate a generator. While diesel generators may be used as backup power for auxiliary systems in some cases, they are not the primary power source for wind turbines.
Wind Farm Backup Generators - Genesal Energy
Here’s a more detailed explanation:
Wind turbines are designed to convert wind energy into electricity:
The wind turns the blades of the turbine, which are connected to a generator. The generator then converts the mechanical energy of the spinning blades into electrical energy.
Diesel generators are sometimes used as backup power:
In certain situations, such as during maintenance or in remote locations, diesel generators may be used to power auxiliary systems like lighting, heating, or control mechanisms.
Wind turbines do not require diesel to operate:
They are designed to function solely on wind energy.
Diesel generators are not part of the core wind turbine system:
While they may be present at a wind farm for certain purposes, they are not the primary energy source for the turbines themselves.
Not in Oklahoma. We are transitioning to electric pumps and solar-powered wells.
I suppose one could argue the point about Obama but it wouldn’t take us anywhere, at least not yet, even though compelling documents have already been released. What was more intriguing to me was that little nugget at the end.
Gabbard also dropped another nugget of information. Virginia Democratic Senator Mark Warner, who was the head of the intelligence committee at the time of the hoax, refused even to give a whistleblower his email address after the person contradicted his findings in the hoax.
Why would Warner not want to give the whistleblower his email?
not specifying whether he was talking about epstein or obama case probably saved him from being fired at the spot by trump lol
I’m not following what you’re talking about.
bongino’s cryptic message
He should have lied, linked Trump to the case and received a promotion.
bongino is worth about 150 million dollar… dont think he is interested in a promotion but some praise from his creepy leader may be to his liking, unless he really decided he doesnt like sexual assaulters anymore
Nice twist but no, public praise would probably embarrass him and I just do not believe he would like that, at all.
2 Likes