Yet, hold on to your seat, because the indictments are coming proving your boasts to be worth exactly nothing.
Big difference in pedos and human traffickers. Where is the semantic fallacy?
Promises promises. Just like your fuhrer.
There is none, obviously. I remember this guy quite well. He’s a pompous blowhard of no merit. He thinks he has game. He has none. He will likely get spanked and run along soon enough.
Apparently you don’t understand the human sex-trafficking involves pedos in large part, try to keep up.
Oh, I have no trouble keeping up. You just inserted the word “sex” before trafficking when your stat included no such word. I went to the ICE site and looked specifically for sex trafficking. They state: “HSI arrested 29 people in 8 states for sex trafficking”. Not 1588 as you claimed.
Unlike most right wingers, I will also link to the source of my information.
The majority here believe in citing our sources. My observation has been that trumpsters and christians are the least likely to show sources. I guess we are to take what you say on “faith”?
1 Like
Warren had a great night. I think CNN was probably disappointed when they realized they had a bunch of republicans running in the democratic debate.
Bernie raised a TON of money the last 24 hours.
Proud to be a new englander.
1 Like
Sanders/Warren 2020? Interesting thought.
1 Like
It is. They seem very much alike. She is not a likable person at all. I may donate to Bernie. If he wins primary, I think he will win general.
I would probably pick Buttagieg if I was Bernie.
lol.
Nice try but:
- Of the 1,588 arrests, 1,543 were for sex trafficking violations.
Oh. Your source is the white house"? lol Yeah, Michele uses that too. Also Infowars and other alt right sites.
I’m not sure why Biden is running. Initially, I thought he was because he figured nobody else had a chance against trump. Initially. I think he was right. I’m not so sure anymore. Certainly, Bernie has a chance. It doesn’t seem like he wanted to run, but felt a duty. I hope he has an awful night, tonight.
Ok, let’s review.
-
I asked, “Why exactly are you giving Trump credit for going after pedos?”
-
You said, “I understand ICE has made the majority of sex-trafficking arrests in the country and Trump fully supports this organization that the Leftists wish to abolish.” This in itself is silly. Trump fully supports this. So what? Everyone supports a reduction in pedophilia. Did Trump DO anything other than cheer? Let’s hear about it if so.
-
I asked (twice), “Where did you get this information?”.
-
You cited 1,588 arrests for trafficking, which you then amended to 1543, based solely on Trump’s claim. Even if we accept this number, you STILL haven’t cited however many arrests/convictions the FBI/DOJ/State-Law-Enforcement did, making it impossible to know if this is the majority or not, and regardless, none of these numbers include any percentage at all of pedophile abuses which is the subject at hand.
-
You then high five yourself and claim victory, not realizing that you have totally failed to prove your point, and have tried to change points several times in the process.
Pretty typical debate with a RWNJ, I’d say.
1 Like
I’m beginning to even think Warren can beat Trump. I really hope you get someone serious about change. Biden is just Obama again.
Yes. I agree on Warren. I believe she has closed the gap with biden.
LOL, the reality is that Pocahontas is about likeable as a prostrate exam. I know that statement might be confusing to some here but to clarify most people don’t care for that procedure.
Reg, it seems when you’re losing an argument you apparently resort to hunting for more rabbit trails than Elmer Fudd.
When you feel the need to have to end your argument with an Ad Hominem fallacy it merely becomes more evidence that your argument is weak.