Then explain it to me.
What is to explain? I quoted the amplified verses already. They are clear.
No, I mean you explain to me how a rich man files bankruptcy and then has his wealth restored.
He filed company bankruptcy. Not personal bankruptcy. He screwed his investors.
Really? I think his investors may have screwed him.
How does an investor screw anyone? Their entire function is to deposit money. Once they do that, their function is complete and they just hope the entrepreneur doesnât go bankrupt like Trump did.
Investors can sometimes take advantage of entrepreneurs during fundraising, leading to detrimental outcomes for the business owner. Here are some common ways this can happen:
- Unfavorable Terms: Investors may propose terms that heavily favor them, such as high equity stakes, excessive control rights, or unfavorable valuations that dilute the entrepreneurâs ownership significantly.
- Misleading Promises: Some investors might promise resources, mentorship, or connections that they do not deliver on, leaving entrepreneurs without the support they expected.
- Excessive Control: Investors may demand board seats or decision-making power that allows them to influence or control the direction of the business, potentially overriding the founderâs vision.
- Hidden Fees: Certain investors may impose hidden fees or costs associated with investment that the entrepreneur is not initially aware of, reducing the amount of capital they actually receive.
- Pressure to Pivot: Investors might pressure entrepreneurs to change their business model or strategy in ways that are not aligned with their original vision or market fit, which can lead to failure.
- Short-Term Focus: Many investors prioritize quick returns, which can lead to unsustainable business practices or pressure to achieve short-term goals at the expense of long-term growth.
- Non-Compete Clauses: Some investment agreements may include restrictive clauses that limit the entrepreneurâs ability to start new ventures or engage in similar businesses in the future.
- Dilution Through Future Rounds: Investors may encourage future funding rounds that dilute the entrepreneurâs equity further, especially if they have a significant stake and influence over subsequent funding decisions.
- Conflicts of Interest: Investors with multiple portfolio companies in the same space may prioritize their other investments over the entrepreneurâs business, leading to conflicts that can hinder growth.
- Inequitable Exit Terms: Investors may negotiate exit terms that are unfavorable to the entrepreneur, such as high liquidation preferences, which ensure they get paid before the founder sees any returns.
Entrepreneurs should carefully vet potential investors, seek legal advice, and ensure that any agreements are fair and transparent to protect their interests.
Now ask ChatGPT if any of that happened in Trumpâs case. spoiler: It didnât.
How do you know? Are you saying you know the operations of those banks? Do you actually know his personal business so well that you even know what the banks did or didnât do to him? How do you know that? Did the banks share their business with you?
No. Itâs Big A$$ets.
King Solomon followed divine instructions on building the temple. You donât understand frequencies of some metals and stones. Angels.
None of this will resonate with you.
is that an american flag i see there way in the distance?
2 Likes
Omg. I nearly freaked out after I posted a video and suddenly for a very short moment a green snake head was looking at me. I hate that POM.
1 Like
Itâs art.
Itâs horror! Terror even. Meanie.
I admire the crazy bastard who took the photo. He has bigger stones than I have.
I really donât freak out easily. But snakes I canât handle.
Is it truly bothering you that much? I can change it if youâre serious.