Did you forget this?
I did. Pictures or a video along with it would be great.
You’ve seen photos. This is my city. It is very, very socialist. Even more so than most other Canadian cities, and most others are pretty socialist. It is also not as flat as Holland.
EDIT: I had lunch at the Olympic Flame in the picture above the other day. Here are a couple of photos of that. The photos above are not mine. The photos below are.
uhm no, we wanted more so we created more land for ourselves to live on
i have to disagree since i believe most religious people have that trait (when pushed the seemingly most peaceful religious people will admit they will gladly murder anyone just to please their god)
so yes the worst thing about canada and colombia is the amount of religious people (well besides introducing justin bieber and shakira to our world lol)
You should have built some mountains when you created that new land.
We all have our religions. Michele has hers. You have yours. I have mine.
Justin Bieber is a double hit since he’s now a religious nut.
Shakira is cool. Isa hates her too, but I like her.
not very convenient to live on, besides human made mountains are usually ugly or garbage dumps:
perhaps by your definition but definitely not according to this one:
the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal god or gods
No, not by that definition, but you don’t have to look far to find a definition that fits.
Pit Bulls. It’s not the dog, it’s the owner. Free speech without limits. No mask mandates. No vaccine mandates. No borders. All people are equal. Hope is stupid. All among your religions.
1 Like
Don’t let Reg intimidate you. A harbor full of ships is much more appealing.
uhm no, that definition also fails the criteria since there is definitely no (blind) faith present at all… all those (and all other) subjects are a matter of opinion and debatable so therefore have absolutely nothing to do with religion
i dont get intimidated by anyone
i prefer a more natural sighting like this:
Nonsense, my religious-nut internet acquaintance. It doesn’t require blind faith. It only requires faith, and you have plenty of faith in your beliefs. I repeat: Michele has her religions, you have yours, I have mine.
Michele believes in her sky fairy and that’s a religion. I believe it dehumanizes us to not provide medical care for every human. This is a belief in a code of ethics and is, therefore, a religion. You believe (quite stupidly) in absolute, unlimited free speech. You think that if someone screams racial insults at young children or yells that they have a bomb on a plane, there should be no government sanctions against that person. That is a code of ethics, and is very much a religion.
lol uhm no i think there is a crucial difference in having opinions / believing in something but still being open to discuss things,
opposite to believing in something without any discussions allowed or even thinking its impossible to do so…
that difference is religion and (blind) faith 
i believe everything is open to debate and everything and everyone should be questioned so i definitely have none of that religious or faith nonsense lol
your defense is a "belief in anything, as a code of ethics?!..
believe in anything?! lol and isnt that a set of standard rules that a group of people are expected to uphold?! lol
i guess one person could make their own standard set of rules which they could obey but i assure you that person isnt me
This is because you appear to be unable to read, Nico the religious nut. Look at the very example I circled in the definition above. “To be of the same faith with someone concerning honesty”. This is obviously an opinion, and the person holding that opinion may well be willing to discuss it, and may well be open to questions about it, but they still have faith in that belief that honesty is the best policy.
You believe that when some pit bull mauls a kid, it isn’t the dog’s bad nature, it is the owner’s bad training/treatment that caused that. You have faith in that belief. You may be willing to entertain questions about it or be willing to discuss it, but you have faith in your belief about this. It is one of your many religions.
You are confusing organized religion with religion. You are confusing a set of clear rules with religion. Some religions are organized and some have a clear set of rules, but not all do. Michele’s does. Mine don’t. Yours don’t.
uhm no, when faith is involved it becomes a belief and its no longer an opinion lol
opinions are based upon (what people believe to be) facts and faith has nothing to do with those
its not faith or a believe that makes me think that an owner can (and should) prevent any and all attacks by their pitbulls (or any type of dog)…
i think they can do that because there are things like training programs and studies and leashes or even muzzles to make that possible
Ah, now we’re down to your usual intellectual dishonesty. This always happens after a few posts.
You believe that, if a pit bull is left at home with a child and attacks and kills the child (which happens quite regularly as any google of news reports will show), that the owner who wasn’t even present at the time is responsible and could have prevented it with better training. This is a belief.
You believe in unlimited free speech. This is a clear set of rules.
You believe vaccines and masks should not be mandated. This is a clear set of rules.
You can now try to put a lot of words around that and try to justify your beliefs and pretend they’re something that they’re not, as many religious nuts like you often do when confronted with the reality of their beliefs, but that won’t change anything. You are what you are. I am what I am. Michele is what she is.
not sure what you consider to be “regularly” since those things very rarely come up in any news i read (and when it does it tends to take place in usa…)
also not sure how or why any parent would leave their kid at home alone with a dog? but dont you think that in that case any attack would be prevented if that parent stayed at home or if they used a dog bench?
(ps a bench is not a belief, its a cage lol)
those are not a set of rules, those are my opinions, they are not enforced upon anyone and they dont seem to belong in any set? lol
i have no need for justifications or believes or however you want to label my opinions since i prefer reality over your distorted views lol
you mean we all are what you make us to be dont you? 
Are you now admitting that Pit Bulls are inherently violent, Nico? More violent and dangerous than other dogs? This is quite a reversal. When Pit Bulls attack, as they often do, you have always blamed everyone except the Pit Bull. Even when a Pit Bull breaks its chains or jumps out of the yard and violently attacks a kid, you blame the owner. Are you now finally admitting that was nonsense (a fact that is obvious to most) and that the Pit Bull is inherently violent?
Here is a case where a 1 year old child was not alone and was in fact being held by another family member when a violent and vicious Pit Bull attacked and killed it. Are you finally going to admit that the dog was violent in nature and posed a threat in and of itself, and it wasn’t the owner’s fault?
No, I mean you have your religions, Nico. That you deny this doesn’t mean you don’t have them. That you choose to call them something other than religions doesn’t change this. And yes, you live in your own reality, as we all do, and in my reality you are a total religious nut.
That was an unbelievably spectacular show. Definitely a Netherlands pro but what are the cons?
uhm no i dont think pitbulls often attack at all and i never blame everyone except the pitbull, i just always blame the owner
even if some uneducated person kicks the dog, the owner should protect it and teach the dog its not ok to bite since its just a silly human needing help
i would gladly admit that if i thought so or if there was at least some evidence towards that but unfortunately there isnt
honestly i dont even see where i remotely said anything that could resemble such nonsense lol i think its all in your head, reg
some might call it faith (lol) but even with my proxy site i get this message:
yes thats true and that you see things that arent really there doesnt prove you are completely senile nor does it mean they arent really there (or at least not to you lol)
why should there be cons?