You’re right. There’s no logical explanation other than Trump was baiting Democrats to make them demand the release that they previously didn’t want released.
Why can’t you see that Trump wasn’t speaking from experience? Unless you have evidence, that I am aware of, Trump has never grabbed any woman.
I do? What do I like about it?
so you are claiming trump didnt release the epstein files on his 1st day of presidency like he promised… because he wanted to control the democrats and let them beg for it and use your legal system to force him before he says yes? and the miss piggy reply was said while he was in full control of himself and he just wanted to force the democats some more eventhough he already said yes?
i guess that sounds uhmm logical for a maga
i cant see that because he was speaking from experience;those are his own words and yes trump was found liable for sexual abuse in the jean carroll case, in that case court also admitted testimonies from jessica leeds and natasha stoynoff
besides that there are 25 more women that were brave enough to have accused trump of various acts of sexual misconduct (i believe in reality there are probably hundreds more victims)
Because for 4 years, while Trump was teasing a demand to release the files, democrats refused to release the files, playing gotcha games with Trump. Why didn’t they release the files as soon as Biden stole the election? Why did they wait 4 years and then demand the same?
I assume liberal reporters are too dumb to understand or they are laying a trap so they have to keep rewording the same question over and over until they hear a statement from Trump they can use against him.
You mean a woman can just say rape and it is so? In that case, I know you graped Gunda. You just look like that kind.
Amazingly, all accusers held their shameful secret until 2016 at the onset of the Trump campaign. None could come forward with their claims of a painful assault any sooner. Their bravery should be commended. It takes a lot of courage to face the man who assaulted you 20 years later. It takes even more courage to dismiss the idea you need to request a rape kit for future evidence, forgoing physical evidence for their hallowed word.
I don’t doubt he’s had his share of women. Should we assume all of Trumps sexual encounters were forced? His locker room talk testifies of the fact that if you have money, they will LET you grab them so how is it they were penetrated against their will?
(as i said before in the trump topic) the democrats/biden have the “active investigation”-excuse; releasing the files could have prevented epstein/maxwell from going to prison
trump doesnt have that excuse and couldve released the epstein files the day he became president
you can assume that but then you would also have to assume that trump fell for it and acted like a pig himself
sure, anyone can say anything, but without evidence no jury would find them liable
no we should not assume all his sexual encounters were forced, i think its very likely he paid for most
they were penetrated against their will because they didnt give consent / couldnt legally give consent because they were minors and its only HIS lockerroom talk not theirs, which only testifies to him being a creepy scumbag
I have seen a documentation yesterday about a German prostitute, who were led into it by her pimp, who she long thought, was her boyfriend. She was a minor back then. Unexperienced about men, being in love, thinking it’s ok. I am from a normal family and I can’t understand this, but that’s how she explained it. I also can’t understand why so many women stay or take so long till they manage to leave a physical or psychological violent partner. But I have to take their word, that it is difficult for many women. I believe them, without understanding it. And I guess that’s simply, because I was raised in a good and decent family with values which protect me from allowing anyone to disrespect me like this.
That prostitute wasn’t a mentally weak person. She was the first prostitute on the Reeperbahn, who managed to survive to pay out her pimp (which she considered for most of the time as her boyfriend and for whom she felt love). Unfortunately she kept on being a prostitute, if also from that on as a domina and on her own with no pimp. She didn’t know or couldn’t imagine to do anything else. And of course, she loved the money, which she wasted all on gambling. Lol, what I actually want to say is, that to me, the fact those girls were minors, isn’t that relevant. I would have the same bad opinion about Trump, Epstein & Co., if they all were 18 plus. Those guys are scum to abuse way younger women. No stable woman would sell her body.
totally agree
a grownup can consent and decide for themselves how to live/destroy their life, a minor cannot!
so you dont believe in the feministic principle that every grownup is “boss of their own body” ?
Here you are wrong, the legal aspect putting aside. People who once started to do bad things, psychologically often (need) to find justifications later for their doing to be able to keep on living. Be it pedos, criminals, murderers. I bet all Cum Ex etc. thieves don’t have a bad conscience. And not because they all are sociopaths.
i dont think so
and thats why you dont “put the legal aspect aside”; without laws people will not only live/destroy their own life but also others
Jesus Christ. I want to adjust the laws for that it’s effectively protecting the innocent, potential victims, not eradicate laws. To judge a case/situation, the actual law is irrelevant.
i think to be effective you should stop calling out for jesus
to protect people the only relevant thing is laws
I 100% agree. So what.
How do you judge anything without the law to gauge what is true?
How does the law protect peoole?
as i said in the other topic:
laws and punishment are there to to help society by encouraging people from commiting crimes in the first place or from committing them again
Yeah, right!!! The only way you don’t do something again is to be inwardly convicted to the point you can’t even live with the thought of it.
I’ve seen countless drug and alcohol abusers convicted in a court of law and as soon as their sentence expired they did it again.
again as i said previously: it only takes for humans to act humane and in a logical manner
those intoxicated by drugs (including religion) usually dont act that way
Oh. How do I act?
illogical / based on blind faith
It makes more sense than your illogical view based on logic.
yes but only to someone that embraces blind faith over logic