dont you think that if you are being starved and chained up long enough, you would probably attack and try to eat anything as well?
Well he did show some discipline by only eating one leg.
i think you are not focussing your anger
the guy that loaded the gun and shot the gun should be blamed, not the gun
Hypotheticals donāt make me angry.
the idea of kids getting hurt makes me angry
Try to think of the dogs training as free speech.
to me dogs are living beings who cant determine what is right or wrongā¦ similar to human kids
that kind of training is the same as abusing children or teaching them to wear a suicide vest
Nevertheless I know youāll agree that the owners freedom of speech in the way he trains the dog is the paramount issue.
i seeā¦ not really, i believe if the owner was only using their voice, no matter if they shouted or tried to teach it with only their voice without using any food or any toys to stimulate, and the animal was normally fed and taken care of then a dog would most likely act friendly towards others
I think the key phrase in your response was āI believeā. You donāt know. The manner in which a man trains his dog is free speech.
yes we all have our believes and experiences
training can be free speech if the training is only done with their voice;)
protest demonstrations are considered free speech.
of course, as long as nobody throws any bricks or something lol
So the protests are actions. Actions deemed to be free speech
i would rephrase and state that the protests are no longer free speech when you add an action other then speech
so if the protesters are walking?
lol yes technically i would call that an addition, after all it could kill plants and ants lol
good day to you sir.
thank you, pleasant nap sir
oh no. not nap time. just end of conversation.