so you are arguing free speech for 4 years olds
and be swiftly corrected
no iam comparing the right of a 4 year old yelling fire to a (in my opinion twisted) adult doing the same
in the first case people will laugh and the second case people will freak out and arrest the person
right, because there are laws against it that apply to all.
apparently it doesnt apply to the 4 year old and its harmless then
so what is different in that scenario? the way people perceive it as a threat or not
so we should hold ourselves to the standard of behavior of a 4 year old.
thats an option lol or we should try to be objective and think for ourselves
apparently words do not cause issues, peoples reactions do
I hope you’ll keep that in mind should the mayor of your charming village incite your neighbors to burn down your house.
yes and may you thinkaboutit before you shoot your gun;)
shooting my gun is a form of free speech.
lol you do all your talking with your gun? guess then it could be considered that if you fire it in the air and no birds or planes are hit
Not all. If birds or planes are hit there is no harm done according to your logic. They had a choice to be in my way.
thats not my logic, we were discussing free speech
speech is not comparable to a violent action in my book
we’ve been over this. when speech leads to violence it is the same.
no, because the violence is not caused by the sound of someones voice but its done by the actions of people
don’t go michele on me and try to relitigate decided matters
if you add other factors and it causes issues, the initial factor is not the problem
It sure as hell can be, Mobs can be whipped into frenzy.
by words alone