Semite does not mean “Jew”, Michele.
Anti-Semite means Jew-hater so you didn’t share anything new.
Yes, that’s what it means today, which is absurd, of course. Most Jews today are not semites. Almost all Palestinians are semites. For antisemite to be perverted into meaning “Jew-hater” is just another example of people twisting things beyond recognition to excuse the atrocity that has been going on in the Middle East for the last 80 years.
80 years is a long time and it should end and it will but I personally believe the world has been in hate mode for Jews since the beginning of their existence but nobody can explain why. What did the Jews do to the world? Nothing, in my opinion, but from one generation to another, the world has passed down their viewed hatred to this day. It’s a disgusting world and I hate having to live in it.
I suggest you ask your AI friend. It might disagree with you.
Oh I don’t need to. I know fully well that the word semite has been redefined over the years, as has the word antisemite. Today, a white ashkenazi Jew living in New York with perhaps 10% semitic blood and 80% Polish blood is considered a semite by some. Not by me.
he insinuated that a “stand down order” may have been given by the Israeli leadership that day, further fueling theories that the Hamas-led attack was an inside job or allowed to happen.
That was a great article, Michele. I doubt if you read it. lol. It presents a theory that Israel might have murdered Charlie Kirk for turning on them. It is well known and documented by many that Kirk was starting to aggressively oppose Israel.
I read it twice.
It also represents a theory that October 7 was an inside job or allowed the attack to happen, which is what the article is about.
Yes, over October 7.
Indeed true. Perhaps you have started seeing some truth here. Tucker Carlson is worth watching on that topic.
Back when the attack happened, I theorized that Israel let the attack happen because Israel knows when a grasshopper jumps the fence. You dismissed that theory. Why are you considering it plausible now?
I don’t recall ever dismissing the theory. I have thought from very early on that Israel allowed this to happen in order to commit a genocide in Gaza, which is happening now. I claim no genius here. Many people saw that.
What I do remember is you defending Israel constantly for as long as I have known you, including the last two years of this genocide.
You ignored every word I said as if my words had no meaning whatsoever. I don’t care about that. I’m completely used to you ignoring anything I say unless it tickles your ears.
Further down that thread I stated I could not bring myself to condemn Israel but I don’t believe I’ve been defending them. Maybe I have but but if I have it’s because you condemn them.
I wasn’t referring to your words today. I was referring to your pro-Israel words over the last many years.
Yes, you have. And yes, I condemn them.
Neither was I. That’s how well you pay attention.
I was referring to a scenario where Israel may have participated in the October 7 attack or at the very least gave an order to stand down and let the attack go forward.
You chicken shit. Get back in here. I’m not finished.
You, after the attack, supported Hamas and made it plain that the Israeli citizens that died, deserved it.
You also condemn Israel for their participation in the attack.
My question is, if you now condemn Israel for their participation in the attack, why did you celebrate the attack on Israel?
You are the biggest cowardly weinnie I have ever known. I’m not going away. In fact, I’m going to haunt you incessantly until your dying day if you don’t answer my question so I wouldn’t live under the assumption that you can ignore this just because you have always gotten away with ignoring me or any other valid point you choose to ignore.
Okay, I may have stretched it a bit. I can’t haunt you incessantly today. I have to work. I will be checking back with hopes I get a valid answer. You have a nice day.