This is completely untrue. Women do not spank their children to cause them pain. What an utterly nonsensical concept. Spankings are more painful for adults than for children. If a child darts out into the road, they are spanked so that they will associate the spanking with trouble to make them aware so they don’t walk into oncoming traffic. You don’t spank them to create pain so that they avoid roads altogether. That’s abuse and you create fear.
Good because I call it abuse and you an abusive person.
Then we should harm frequent fliers with small fines for vacation travel.
I’m not a yank. Yanks are stuffy northerners. And I don’t really care what the rest of the world thinks about our roads, highways or bridges as long as they stay in their lane. Pun intended.
Yes they do. They then hope that pain will cause the child to not behave the same way, but pain is the intention. If it wasn’t, they would use feathers.
You are absurd. That’s not abusive, that’s just the truth.
To the rest of the world, all Americans are called yanks.
It all makes sense now. From the beginning African Muslims have been determined to exact revenge on the countries that they feel victimized by. While we think they are migrating for new life, in reality, they only migrated here to witness and/or participate in the destruction of France and the governments that invaded their country have deliberately hid this from citizens. Why? Because leadership in America and Europe are part of a worldwide club and we aren’t in it. That’s why Muslims are punching us in the face. They are sending a clear message through violence probably because they don’t know how to fight any other way and France is not going to judge them in court. France has had no choice but to call in help to control the situation on the ground there, although it wouldn’t surprise me if they never received adequate protection from the violence perpetrated on civilians.
America will have to call in the United Nations to stop the violence here, only they will probably take it to an extreme with us, murdering both illegal immigrant and citizen. That may be why the word “bloodbath” keeps getting tossed around in media word salads. I believe that was the plan from day 1. Make it as ugly as possible and then kill us.
It actually is. Those people can do as they please. They run the country from the street corner or their designated lookout post. It’s a little scary because those flockers carry big guns and have no problem killing a woman for not covering her head according to sharia law, but they have no problem killing officers of the Law to free a drug Lord according to their own law of logic. They all have depraved minds and they are spreading out all around the west to execute their agenda, which is Sharia Law. How they are going make that happen is anyone’s guess but my gun is loaded and I’m ready to die for what I believe in.
Why he has been arrested has not been disclosed yet but activity on Telegram suggests classified information out of Israel has been shared by hackers on Telegram, bringing to the forefront an issue with moderators and sharing of nude content. He’s looking at 20 years in a French prison.
This article indicates a warrant was issued alleging money laundering, drug trafficking and the sharing of child sexual abuse content on Telegram but Tucker Carlson says he was arrested for refusal to censor the truth.
No, the French government doesn’t care what your moderation policy is. It only cares if the content violated French law, and then they care who is responsible. Is the platform partially responsible because it should keep such content off its system, or is the original poster solely responsible? That’s the question.
BBAD is tiny and is likely never going to face this, but it is why I have made clear that any illegal content will be deleted. I’m not going to jail for anyone.
How do you accommodate the content laws of every country? That seems impossible.
The answer is yes but only as far as his own policy requires, imo. If the country filing the charge doesn’t like it they should block that social media outlet. That’s the way I see it but then I’m against government control.
The way it usually works is the government contacts the site and says “We don’t like this, take it down”. If you obey, they leave you alone. If you resist, they destroy you.
I am no hero. I will obey.
This is not right. The French government does not care at all what your policy is or what my policy is (or what Elon’s policy is, or what Pavel Durov’s policy is). They care about their laws. That’s it.
Instead, they issue warrants for the arrest of the people in charge and destroy them. They don’t care if you or I feel they shouldn’t.
Okay, Reg. You’ve driven your point home. I get it but we live in a true one world society now and the French government doesn’t own the world, as the UAE seems eager to remind them.
Telegram is fast becoming the most downloaded social media site in the world. Leadership in France will quickly resemble Bud Light.
There are several interesting points here. The future of social media, transnational corporations and government interaction. I believe it will be a positive change, at least, for a little while.
I’m not sure how to invert this statement to mean what the writer is saying here but I believe it’s true in this context.
The crisis of liberal globalization has led to a change in the international reality (you could also invert that statement and say the reverse without changing the essence).