This is fun. I’m a misogynist because I don’t post in the correct thread. lol. You’re quite nutty, Gunda.
It seems, your bulb always suffers a short circuit on women. Than your logic and all your rationality becomes non existent suddenly, lol.
I am going to write this slowly for you:
#1: You only post negative in the feminism thread (regardless if it’s the correct thread or not). Why?
#2: You don’t open an equivalent (to your feminism) thread about men, to criticize men for doing the same or orher equally silly things, you criticize women for. Again, why?
I really would love to enlighten your world. But maybe your bulb isn’t to fix. 
lol. Your writing speed is entirely invisible to me. I will only see your post after you finish. So take as long as you want. lol.
-
You’re mad because I have only posted things in the feminism thread which you find negative. This is amusing, childish, and nutty, given that I’ve posted endless positive things about women in other threads, including yesterday about Canada’s rugby team.
-
I post ENDLESS things about men doing stupid things. Vastly more than I post of women doing stupid things.
-
I don’t limit any of my posts to any particular thread. I have never cared about being off topic.
Please carry on with the bunny boiling. I’m quite enjoying this.
And now, within the next few posts, you will say you are “enjoying this” because I said that and you aren’t very original. lol.
PS: How is it negative for these strong, independent women to spend $4000 to screech and beat up the road with their sticks if they choose? It’s their money and their lives, and I doubt the road will be materially worse for wear. To me, this is no more negative than someone going bungee jumping. Or going up in one of those gliders you used to post. I would NEVER do that myself, and I find it absurd, but if other people want to, and they spend $4k to do it, I say let them. It’s not my business.
Gosh, that was a joke, Reggie. 
You don’t even get that, lol.
Now, after having had my first coffee and found nice music to start my day, I am in the mood to read further your nonsense, which I had to stop after the first sentence.
Reggie, I never questioned or adressed anything you wrote in the rest of your post. Yes, you sometimes write positive about women in sport etc. Fine. So does Trump. And yet Trump is a sexist and in my eyes also a misogynist. Writing sometimes positively about women proves nothing.
Only posting negative things in the feminism thread (while claiming to be a feminist on top of that, lol), speaks volume, though. You claim you want best for women, yet if you sum up your demands, it’s like if Charlie Kirk was speaking. I watched several women-relating speeches by him and all he said, I already heard from you.
Do you realize, that I didn’t open a thread similar like your Feminism thread, to post only negative stuff about men? You never asked yourself why? I tell you why, as ypu obviously lack the skills to comprehend why that makes a huge difference:
I don’t look down on men, as you look down on women. I don’t want to control men, as you want to control women, either. Be it generally or in my relationships. All I want is, that women don’t get disadvantaged for becoming mothers and taking care of the family and the older generation. If men want their partners to stay at home or only to work in low income jobs a few hours maximum as a consequence of choosing motherhood, fine, as long as they then share their income with them. It’s just fair to consider the whole income (I don’t speak of the assets before they bonded) to belong to both equally. If men disagree to this, then don’t bitch about, that women seek careers. But that’s a total different topic anyway.
You keep calling it negative. You didn’t answer my basic question. I will repeat it:
How is it negative for these strong, independent women to spend $4000 to screech and beat up the road with their sticks if they choose? It’s their money and their lives, and I doubt the road will be materially worse for wear. To me, this is no more negative than someone going bungee jumping. Or going up in one of those gliders you used to post. I would NEVER do that myself, and I find it absurd, but if other people want to, and they spend $4k to do it, I say let them. It’s not my business.
I already answered you, but you didn’t notice it somehow. I try it again:
You wrote that. Reggie, be honest, if you would have found their behaviour not crazy and ugly but wonderful, would you then really have posted it in Feminism? Show me just one positive post of yours in the Feminism thread. Why is it there is none of yours?
Strong women doing things they want to do is feminism, regardless of whether I find it crazy and ugly. And since I find most feminists crazy and, well, you know the rest, it seemed appropriate to put it in this thread. And for what it’s worth, I find this new MGTOW (men going their own way) movement crazy and ugly, too.
You really seem to have a mental block about the words positive and negative. I repeat for what seems like the hundredth time: to me, the video of the screeching women beating the ground with sticks was positive. Seriously. People doing what they want to do while harming nobody and paying for it with their own money is positive. So I did post a positive video in the feminism thread, and that’s the video we’re talking about. I can find their behaviour crazy, ugly and positive, all at the same time. And no, I’m not weaseling out or being sarcastic. I think it’s totally positive that these women are doing whatever they want to do with their money, time and energy while harming nobody.
I find your glider videos crazy and ugly, too, and I also consider them positive. People should do what they want with their lives, even if what they want is as silly as flying around in an unpowered aircraft. I also find the vertigo vomit inducing. But it’s still positive.
And your Reinhard Mey, Sting and Bruce Springsteen videos are absolutely crazy and ugly. Honestly, I think I’d rather listen to those screechy women than any of those men. Springsteen especially looks and sounds like he’s taking a tricky dump when he sings. Now that I think of it, every single time I can remember saying or thinking what you posted was tasteless, it has been about a guy being tasteless, not a girl.
In my opinion, Reg spreads negative information evenly and would do the same with positive information if there were any to post.
Oh yeah, absolutely he would, lol.
On a serious note. Do you think there are no positive excamples to be post in the Feminism thread?
Absolutely. Just not in the women screaming.
1 Like
This made me chuckle.
A positive video about Feminism.
To this I agree. I dislike hysterical or loud women. As I dislike hysterical and loud men.
So, now you aren’t a feminist anymore?
Another negative post about feminism and again, you are dishonest about it.
She is right and wrong.
She is right regarding that men get discriminated when it comes to child custody and that the punishment for wrong accusations of rape isn’t high enough.
But so is the punishment for rape, as the victims get a life sentence, while most rapists don’t realize the amount of damage they caused and likely rape again after the few months of sentence they have got, if even. She forgot to mention that somehow and I wonder how the MRA’s opinion on that matter is. Or their opinion, if the partner who stays at home to take care of the family, should legally own half of the working partners income, as low or high it may be. You marry and you stick together in good and in bad times. Together is the word I want to highlight here.
She is also wrong, that feminism means to discriminate men, which she sort of did by uttering, that she doesn’t identify herself as a Feminist anymore (but not anti-feminist either). This is simply wrong and can easily be read up in one minute after looking up the definition of feminism on wikipedia etc. Nowhere there stands anything about discriminating of men or that feminists support child custody only for women or that wrong acusations of rape should not get punished etc.
I as a Feminist, never had any of her past opinions or her attitude regarding those men she describes as (former) enemies. Never heard of MRA, but I totally support them regarding child custody, false rape accusations etc.
If those men aren’t as blind as she once was, and support feminism as she now thankfully fights also for their rights, then this is good for us all, both men and women!
It amuses me that her prior self has a lot in common with you, Reggie. You accuse me of hating men, despite I never said anything she said in this video about men’s rights. I always agreed with you when we talked about false rape accusations, child custody etc. You at the other side kept clinging onto your wrong opinion about me and your general negative view on feminism. You still aren’t able to acknowledge that feminism isn’t about discriminating or even hating men, but to eradicate the disadvantages which still exist in society for women - because they are women. How those feminists argue or how their views on other topics like men’s rights are, doesn’t change the definition of feminism Some call themselves feminists, some don’t, despite they fight for the very same goals (like this film maker).
And just because I don’t hang out the rainbow flag or use pronoms to identify myself, or open a thread for promoting a homosexual, transgender or heterosexual men’s rights thread, I still support their rights. Just like the black rights movement isn’t wrong, only for not also holding up signs to support the non-discrimination of white people.
Lol, I just found this video by accident. Was actually looking for more funny Michael Caine stories.
And yet, you oppose a law which guarantees housewives legal access to half of the income of their hubbies, and to get adequately support in case their marriage fails, to make up for the disadvantages they face for being housewives.
In pre-feminism times, women were belittled by men and not seen as equals, because they “only” were mothers and stayed at home. Their less rights and subordinant role was justified with it. And now men whine and blame women for low birthrates, if women proof them wrong by qualifying themselves and aspiring good paid jobs.
My mother was a housewife. Couldn’t leave my father, because society didn’t offer her that alternative. You seriously believe she was happy, lol?
I am fed up with hypocrits and ignorants. Men or women.
That’s a great dad.
So a woman marries, gets half the husband’s income and assets, cheats on her husband, leaves him for another man, lies about how he was emotionally distant and controlling, and he has to give her half and support her until she dies. You should run for Kanzler on that platform. 