You call this action? Yawn*
Hypocrite! The more they reveal about our beloved artificial intellect, the more I know that if we want to get to the truth, we have to open investigations into all of these elbow-rubbing elites. I just don’t know how to make that happen since the elites keep company with the FBI and CIA.
Do you like bill gates?
I used to like him. Then the Epstein thing came along. Then Melinda said she divorced him because of Epstein and while she didn’t reveal anything juicy, I just think she’s the one who would know if there was any fire behind that smoke.
I didn’t like his recent interview justifying his private jet use.
All of this said, he’s probably a better human being than I am overall, and he certainly handled his money and power better than I would have in youth if I had had any.
Just think, if your brain starts to reject your truth or if you just want to reject the truth in your brain, you can take the jab and stop thinking for yourself.
Clinical trials of Bill Gates’ micro-needle vaccine patch have been deemed successful.
2 Likes
“The picture of the world’s richest man killing the world’s poorest children is not a pretty one.” ~Bill Gates
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/bill-gates-foundation-1.7530127?cmp=rss
Yawn. As if USAid ever served any other goal than to gain political influence.
USAID was obviously created to gain political influence. That’s ok. Every time some rich prick donates a wing to a hospital or a building to a university, it is a purchase of influence. That said, it is still better to do this than to not do it. When Erika got cancer surgery at the Jim Pattison outpatient center here in Surrey, her cancer was cured, and she wasn’t negatively affected by the name of the building. The same goes for the HIV patients helped by USAID.
another r’amen!
and am sure many people that worked at usaid did it only to help others… until they got fired 
I am not sure about that. It‘s a very sharp and the smartest tool to manipulate people without having to apply violence. Actually it’s the most effective one. I would prefer the countries would do such things by themselves and not by foreigners with a hidden agenda contrary to the countries long term interest. If I had a say, I would kick out any political and religious foreign NGOs from my country.
yes i say the same about people trying to save dogs in other countries, they should do it themselves
What utter nonsense. Rescuing dogs doesn’t come with a political agenda which actual and only goal is to benefit the helpers own country. In fact, my country doesnt benefit anything at all, if my organization (or any other one) rescues dogs in other countries. Rather the opposite. Those countries profitate from us by paying people there working in our shelter, for paying companies there for buying material and building and repairing our shelter as well as paying for transporting dogs to Germany. Not to forget the Romanian vet which earns himself a golden nose. And some rescue dogs get taken by German dog shelters, for which German communities and people pay.
Foolish fantasy. Cancer is not and never will be curable. Doesn’t she have to take some kind of medicine for the rest of her life. And if she doesn’t take it, won’t her cancer come back somewhere else and possibly at a different stage?
Too bad you have no say.
Cancer can always come back. She has to take drugs because they took out her thyroid. She’s fine. She is cancer free right now.
1 Like
Just making sure we are on the same page and obviously we are.
We aren’t on the same page. Her cancer was cured. Cancer can still come back.
Isa’s thyroid cancer was cured. Period. It is possible she may still die of another cancer later in life. The two statements are not in conflict at all.
I can get a bacterial infection and that infection might be cured by antibiotics. That doesn’t mean I will never get a bacterial infection again.
Well…we were, then we weren’t again because you keep saying cancer is curable when it’s never curable. It’s treatable, at best. Taking her thyroid out did not cure her. If it did, she would never have to be concerned with it returning.
If she gets cancer again, it will be a new cancer. Not the old one returning. The old one can’t return. She doesn’t have a thyroid anymore.
Anyway, I don’t see the point in arguing this. If you think cancer is only treatable, think that. It is not true, but I have no quarrel with your believing that.