Got something against drunken sailors?
Let me restate that. You have a really nice mouth.
Let me restated mine - Go fuck yourself incel.
canāt talk now
my house is surrounded by biden supporters
come to take away my penis
no wait
they want my assault rifle
no wait
itās the same thing
Is this right? Should people who are here but not citizens be allowed to possess a gun when citizens who have a felony against them risk jail if they carry openly?
I think itās great. Hopefully this obviously absurd ruling will lead to some new restrictions to the insanely permissive gun laws in the US today.
No doubt, Reg. But Iām learning how things work in America and I can tell you for certain the only restrictions passed here will be, as always, against its tax-paying citizens. Illegal and criminal mafia traffickers will never suffer restrictions or pay for anything, not here and not in this life.
Criminals, by definition, donāt obey the law. Thatās one issue. The other is that almost all the gun violence cases we talk about here use legally procured guns. Thatās a second, separate, issue.
So you admit, the illegal immigrant is a criminal. Thank you.
Yes, the illegal immigrant is a criminal. You are also a criminal if you use or have ever used marijuana. Itās about the same level of crime to me.
How is it the same?
How is it not the same?
PS: Quit asking glib short questions of me. It is a lazy way to make your point.
As a glib citizen of this country, Iām protected by the U.S. Constitution to keep and bear arms, you whine bag. If he were, at the very least, a permanent resident he could carry but heās not. That stupid judge didnāt think it through. When he goes to apply for a gun heās going to be asked a series of question about his criminal background. Crossing the border illegally makes him a criminal, unless some other useless justice decides we have infringed on his right to reject an application.
Now that Iāve made my glib point, why donāt you attempt to make your vaguely irrelevant point.
I already made my point. There are lots of crimes. Some are more serious than others. I donāt consider crossing a border without checking in as a particularly serious crime.
The guy was arrested for possession of a firearm. Itās stands to reason that he got an American attorney to represent him at taxpayer expense. That would be me. Are you following me? He has a right to due process in a court of law just like anyone else but he has no right to carry or use a gun in this country. Our incompetent justice system besides allowing him to legally carry, dropped the gun charge against him.
This irritates me because the system has no problem charging a citizen, sending them to jail, slapping them with an exorbitant fine and as a felon, stripping them of their right to carry or use, for life. Justify that, Reg.
I agree with you on that. Letās see if we can simplify this.
-
Crossing a border without checking in is a minor crime to me. Yes it is a crime, but it is not particularly serious in my eyes.
-
Possession of a firearm is a very serious crime and should be treated very seriously. People who do that should be imprisoned. This includes illegal immigrants, legal immigrants, tourists and citizens.
-
I totally disagree with the courtās decision to drop gun possession charges against this illegal immigrant.
-
I believe the US should change its laws to bring gun possession charges against everyone who possesses a gun.
Clear now?
As mud!
One last glib question. Should we have to pay for attorneys to represent them? I personally believe if they come here illegally they should represent themselves or fund their own attorney.
They donāt even speak English, Michele. Why bother with a trial if youāre going to rig the results?