We found a common denomination in her views
I respect her view, too, very much. Bruderhofers soooo gliberal yet loveable.
Well first of all a baby inside the womb is as much a living human being as outside the womb namely it cannot live by itself and needs supply. The discrimination between inside and outside is a mere artificial one supposedly by unnatural socialst lawmakers.
Antiabortionists (without a “consistant life ethics”) IMHO don’t have a problem with elderly people receiving assisted suicide because they had their chance, supposedly sinned and lived their life whereas a baby is innocent and hadn’t had his chance to follow Jeshua on the straight and narrow path…
To which extend? Hasn’t god set a fixed date for us to pass away and aren’t we cheating on him if we apply pacemakers, blood transfusions, bypasses, forced feeding? And aren’t we cheating on ourselves if we avoid all “natural death causes” hence remaining with the complex ones (complex medical conditions)?
I’d rather die of a heart-attack within a few hours than waiting conciousless in a bed on a machine/ life-supply for years, a burden to my clan, until some faithless scientist determines that my brains stopped working…
Love to hear from you!
It is an interesting topic and I do understand you liberals through her teaching a bit better. I also just signed a legal medical contract stating that I reject almost ANY life-enlarging method including blood transfusion and pacemaker implantation in case of losing my conciousness. It is a hot topic! But we got to stay true to our maker!