Coronavirus

Maybe they went fishing down at the river.

You’re mocking me since I know you already know what the Passover is. I’ll just sit here and wait for you to dry heave your mockery into the thread.

Im going to bed.

i dont see how asking you what will happen when i open my door is mockery but ok if you think its too silly to mention i understand

nitey nite;)

He didn’t say until ā€œeveryā€ human being was vaccinated but he did say until the population was widely vaccinated we may not have large gatherings at all. He makes me ill and I’m starting to despise him. Who in Hell does he think he is, trying to control us like robots.

ā€œthose may not come back at allā€

School?

lol he is just giving his opinion on what may happen and what he would like to see happen
why dont you like him?

That’s far-teaching for one man. He must have a lot of people with the medical field backing him, like Fauchi.

He has enough money to make it happen.

All he needs is a few people to support his ideology.

Apparently, the Left supports him.

Your silence is draining me. I’ll come back when Reg is up.

not sure how to reply to this, you seem obsessed and scared and i dont see why

It is a guess, of course, as was fairly clear by my saying ā€œI am now convinced that something on the order of 10 million would have died sooner if the world hadn’t locked downā€. It is based on the idea of a 50% worldwide infection rate (3.5 billion roughly) and a 0.3% mortality rate.

As I said clearly, the guess is also based on zero lockdown. I absolutely do NOT expect 10 million to die given that the world HAS locked down. The lockdown has clearly slowed the spread of the disease to the point that far fewer than 50% should be infected. Most countries are reporting well under 0.1% infection (although I expect the real numbers to be closer to 1-10%).

then how do you figure10 million dying still to be a better choice over what you consider to be this world lock down that is happening now?

A very reasonable question. The 10 million dead would mostly have died anyway within the next 2 years. You’re generally saving a sick 90 year old so he can reach 91. I am guessing this worldwide lockdown is going to cost many times that in man-years and that the victims will mostly be youthful and the lives lost will be in their primes. This is before you even consider the devastating effect this is having on so many economies, although that economic devastation will lead to a lot of the youthful lives lost so it’s all intertwined.

just trying to understand you and you explained that very well;)

now try and explain ageofgraces fear of bill gates lol

lol. Ok, you stumped me.

Bill is ego-driven, hence his save-the-world charity. I subscribed to his blog and then unsubscribed a few years later because, to be frank, I didn’t find him very insightful. I don’t find him likeable. I have no idea why he’s the latest target of the RWNJ conspiracy crowd, though. He’s doing good work, even if his motive is to make people believe he’s a saint.